Experience, memory and intelligence

The Monist 68 (4):507-521 (1985)

Authors
John T. Sanders
Rochester Institute of Technology
Abstract
What characterizes most technical or theoretical accounts of memory is their reliance upon an internal storage model. Psychologists and neurophysiologists have suggested neural traces (either dynamic or static) as the mechanism for this storage, and designers of artificial intelligence have relied upon the same general model, instantiated magnetically or electronically instead of neurally, to do the same job. Both psychology and artificial intelligence design have heretofore relied, without much question, upon the idea that memory is to be understood as a matter of internal storage. In what follows, I shall first sketch the most important reasons for skepticism about this model, and I shall then propose an outline of an alternative way of talking about memory. This will provide an appropriate framework for suggesting a few implications for future work in artificial intelligence.
Keywords Experience  Intelligence  Memory  Metaphysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist19856847
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
335 ( #13,882 of 2,319,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #23,941 of 2,319,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature