Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 98 (98):35-54 (2001)
This paper describes the position of scientific realism and presents the basic lines of argument for the position. Simply put, scientific realism is the view that the aim of science is knowledge of the truth about observable and unobservable aspects of a mind-independent, objective reality. Scientific realism is supported by several distinct lines of argument. It derives from a non-anthropocentric conception of our place in the natural world, and it is grounded in the epistemology and metaphysics of common sense. Further, the success of science entitles us to infer both the approximate truth of mature scientific theories and the truth-conduciveness of the methods of science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Scientific Realism and the Inevitability of Science.Howard Sankey - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):259-264.
Criteria for Attributing Predictive Responsibility in the Scientific Realism Debate: Deployment, Essentiality, Belief, Retention ….Timothy D. Lyons - 2009 - Human Affairs 19 (2).
Invariance, Structure, Measurement – Eino Kaila and the History of Logical Empiricism.Matthias Neuber - 2012 - Theoria 78 (4):358-383.
Similar books and articles
Scientific Realism and the God's Eye Point of View.Howard Sankey - 2004 - Epistemologia 27 (2):211-226.
Science and Reality.[author unknown] - 1929 - Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (16):580-581.
Platonism and Anti-Platonism: Why Worry?Mary Leng - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):65 – 84.
Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science.Howard Sankey - 2008 - Ashgate.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads144 ( #32,795 of 2,169,146 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #38,520 of 2,169,146 )
How can I increase my downloads?