- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering
In Stephen Holland (ed.), Arguing About Bioethics. Routledge. pp. 93 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Children, Bionic Athletes, and Genetic Engineering.MichaelJ Sandel - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press. pp. 71.
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. [REVIEW]Brian G. Henning - 2011 - The Pluralist 6 (2):110-114.
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. [REVIEW]Brian G. Henning - 2011 - The Pluralist 6 (2):110-114.
Michael J. Sandel, the case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. [REVIEW]Corey McCall - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (2):241-245.
Reseña de "the case against perfection. Ethics in the age of genetic engineering" de Michael J. Sandel.Daniel Loewe - 2010 - Signos Filosóficos 12 (23):207-212.
Seeking perfection: A Kantian look at human genetic engineering.Martin Gunderson - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):87-102.
Selecting children: The ethics of reproductive genetic engineering.S. Matthew Liao - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.
The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering.Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (1):39-40.
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering (review). [REVIEW]Brian G. Henning - 2011 - The Pluralist 6 (2):110-114.
Michael J. Sandel: The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. [REVIEW]Ilhan Ilkilic & Rainer Brömer - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (2):183-185.
Respecting privacy in detecting illegitimate enhancements in athletes.Sarah Teetzel - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):159 – 170.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
326 (#59,797)
6 months
18 (#135,981)
2014-01-26
Downloads
326 (#59,797)
6 months
18 (#135,981)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence.Alberto Giubilini & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (2):169-188.
The Epistemology of Cognitive Enhancement.J. Adam Carter & Duncan Pritchard - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (2):220-242.
Procreative Altruism: Beyond Individualism in Reproductive Selection.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (4):400-419.
Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement.Lucius Caviola, Adriano Mannino, Julian Savulescu & Nadira Faber - 2014 - Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8.
Looking into the shadow: The eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices.Giulia Cavaliere - 2018 - Monash Bioethics Review 36 (1-4):1-22.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo