The free market model versus government: A reply to Nozick

Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick argues, first, that free-market anarchism is unstable -that it will inevitably lead back to the state; and, second, that without a certain "redistributive" proviso, the model is unjust. If either of these things is the case, the model defeats itself, for its justification purports to be that it provides a morally acceptable alternative to government (and therefore to the state). I argue, against Nozick's contention, that his "dominant protection agency" neither meets his monopoly condition for statehood nor need run afowl of his redistributive requirement. This being the case, his argument against free market anarchism fails.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-16

Downloads
718 (#11,462)

6 months
18 (#53,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John T. Sanders
Rochester Institute of Technology

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references