Zygon 42 (1):111-122 (2007)
Abstract |
The causal indeterminacy suggested by quantum mechanics has led to its being the centerpiece of several proposals for divine action that does not contradict natural laws. However, even if the theoretical concerns about the reality of causal indeterminacy are ignored, quantum-level divine action fails to resolve the problem of ongoing, responsive divine activity. This is because most quantum-level actions require a significant period of time in order to reach macroscopic levels whether via chaotic amplification or complete divine control of quantum events. Therefore, quantum-level divine action either requires divine foreknowledge of purportedly free or random events or imposes such limitations on divine actions that they become late, potentially impotent, and confused. I argue that the theological problem of divine action remains; even at its most promising, quantum mechanics offers insufficient resolution. This failure suggests a reexamination of the assumptions that God is temporal and lacks foreknowledge of future contingencies.
|
Keywords | chaos theory divine action divine temporality indeterminism quantum mechanics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2006.00808.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Chaos and Complexity.R. J. Russell, N. Murphy & A. R. Peacocke (eds.) - 1995 - Vatican Observatory Publications.
God, Eternity and the Nature of Time.Alan G. Padgett - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):117-119.
Does God Cheat at Dice? Divine Action and Quantum Possibilities.Nicholas T. Saunders - 2000 - Zygon 35 (3):517-544.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Near-Death Experiences Are Not Evidence for Either Atheism or Theism.Keith Augustine - 2019 - In Joseph W. Koterski & Graham Oppy (eds.), Theism and Atheism: Opposing Viewpoints in Philosophy. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference USA. pp. 594-596.
Similar books and articles
Towards a Micro Realistic Version of Quantum Mechanics, Part I.Nicholas Maxwell - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (3):275-292.
On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics.Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 10.1007/S10701-008-9259-4 39 (1):20-32.
Towards a Micro Realistic Version of Quantum Mechanics, Part II.Nicholas Maxwell - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (6):661-676.
Implications of Quantum Theory in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.David Wallace - manuscript
Does the Minimal Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Resolve the Measurement Problem?Nicholas Maxwell - 1975 - Methodology and Science 8:84-101.
Quantum Mechanics: Are There Quantum Jumps? Trieste, Italy, 5 Spetember -2005 and on the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics Lošinj, Croatia 7-9 September 2005. [REVIEW]Angelo Bassi (ed.) - 2006 - American Institute of Physics.
A Probabilistic Approach to Quantum Mechanics Based on Tomograms.Michele Caponigro, Stefano Mancini & Vladimir I. Man'ko - unknown
What is Bohmian Mechanics.Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi - 2004 - International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43:1743-1755.
The Bohmian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics : A Pitfall for Realism.A. Matzkin & V. Nvrock - unknown
Patching Physics and Chemistry Together.Robert C. Bishop - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):710-722.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-14
Total views
82 ( #140,244 of 2,499,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,749 of 2,499,869 )
2010-09-14
Total views
82 ( #140,244 of 2,499,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,749 of 2,499,869 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads