Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):441-459 (2009)

Roger Sansom
Texas A&M University
One current version of the internalism/externalism debate in evolutionary theory focuses on the relative importance of developmental constraints in evolutionary explanation. The received view of developmental constraints sees them as an internalist concept that tend to be shared across related species as opposed to selective pressures that are not. Thus, to the extent that constraints can explain anything, they can better explain similarity across species, while natural selection is better able to explain their differences. I challenge both of these aspects of the received view and propose a hierarchical view of constraints.
Keywords Philosophy   Evolutionary Biology   Philosophy of Biology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10539-008-9121-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.David L. Hull - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two “EvoDevos”.Marta Linde Medina - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (1):7-11.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
99 ( #102,474 of 2,421,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,098 of 2,421,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes