Understanding Frege’s notion of presupposition

Synthese 199 (5-6):12603-12624 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why did Frege offer only proper names as examples of presupposition triggers? Some scholars claim that Frege simply did not care about the full range of presuppositional phenomena. This paper argues, in contrast, that he had good reasons for employing an extremely narrow notion of ‘Voraussetzung’. On Frege’s view, many devices that are now construed as presupposition triggers either express several thoughts at once or merely ‘illuminate’ a thought in a particular way. Fregean presuppositions, in contrast, are essentially tied to names.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-30

Downloads
465 (#49,860)

6 months
131 (#45,680)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thorsten Sander
University of Duisburg-Essen

Citations of this work

Taxonomizing Non-at-Issue Contents.Thorsten Sander - 2022 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 99 (1):50-77.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.

View all 69 references / Add more references