Understanding the Separation Thesis

Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):213-232 (2008)
Many writers in the field of business ethics seem to have accepted R. Edward Freeman’s argument to the effect that what he calls “the separation thesis,” or the idea that business and morality can be separated in certain ways, should be rejected. In this paper, I discuss how this argument should be understood more exactly, and what position “the separation thesis” refers to. I suggest that there are actually many interpretations (or versions) of the separation thesis going around, ranging from semantic, empirical and reformative to some which are straightforwardly normative. While it is generally agreed that the separation thesis should be rejected, then, there is not as much agreement on what this thesis actually says. I suggest that whether or not we should<br>reject the separation thesis, however, ultimately must depend on how we understand it more exactly—on certain interpretations, the thesis comes out as more or less trivially false, but we should demand more evidence or argument to reject it on certain other interpretations. This result presents a challenge for all those writers who are committed to the rejection of the separation thesis.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1052-150X
DOI 10.5840/beq200818216
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reintegrating Ethics and Institutional Theories.Richard P. Nielsen & Felipe G. Massa - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (1):135-147.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Judging Who Should Live: Schneiderman and Jecker on the Duty Not to Treat.William Harper - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):500 – 515.
Makers' Rights.A. John Simmons - 1998 - Journal of Ethics 2 (3):197-218.
Positivism And The Inseparability Of Law And Morals.Leslie Green - 2008 - New York University Law Review 83:1035--1058.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Three Separation Theses.James Morauta - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (2):111-135.
Understanding the Separation Thesis.Ben Wempe - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):549-553.
The Tide is Turning on the Separation Thesis?Joakim Sandberg - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):561-565.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

652 ( #1,947 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums