Whistleblowing and Complicity in Normative Theorizing on Political Corruption

European Journal of Political Theory (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their work “Political Corruption: The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions,” Ceva and Ferretti defend a conception of corruption as a breach of the duty of accountability for officeholders. I address two key aspects of their proposal. First, I contend that whistleblowing disclosures should be limited to acts of last resort, rather than as a common practice of ensuring answerability. Second, I argue that their account does not adequately distinguish between degrees of involvement in corrupt activities. Within hierarchical organizations, not all officeholders possess the same capacity and power to counteract unjust practices. Different contributory roles entail varying degrees of responsibility within the normative structure of answerability defended by the authors.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-19

Downloads
15 (#974,850)

6 months
11 (#272,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniele Santoro
Universidade do Minho

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references