Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (4):1-19 (2021)

Authors
Jennifer Hayes
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Situated in critiques of the “moral muteness” of technical rationality, we examine concepts of ethics and the avoidance of ethical language among Australian gas pipeline engineers. We identify the domains in which they saw ethics as operating, including public safety, environmental protection, sustainability, commercial probity, and modern slavery. Particularly with respect to ethical matters that bear on public safety, in the course of design and operational activities, engineers principally advocated for action using technical language, avoiding reference to potential consequences such as death or destruction of property. Within their organizations, they saw themselves as occupying a technical “line of defense”. We argue that this focus on technical language is action-oriented. Ethics tells practitioners of unacceptable outcomes, but it does not guide them in what they need to do to avoid that outcome in practice. We observed some cases where engineers had not made the connection between their role and ethics in the sense of public safety. We argue that muteness on ethical matters can obscure the nature of the risk where technical advice is being taken on by non-technical actors, and where technical actors themselves do not have a clear sense of their public safety obligations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-021-00324-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics.Charles E. Harris - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):153-164.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Nazi Engineers: Reflections on Technological Ethics in Hell.Eric Katz - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):571-582.
By What Authority? Conflicts of Interest in Professional Ethics.Louis Charland - 2008 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 3 (2):1-3.
Integrating Ethics Into Technical Courses: Micro-Insertion. [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):717-730.
Rhetoric, Technical Writing, and Ethics.Michael Davis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478.
For Ethical Reflection, Establish a Clear Technical Foundation.Chuck Huff - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3):292-294.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-07-11

Total views
3 ( #1,322,361 of 2,448,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,322 of 2,448,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes