Whither the alternatives: Determinants and consequences of selective versus comparative judgemental processing

Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):367 - 386 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Judgements of the value or likelihood of a focal object or outcome have been shown to vary dramatically as a function of whether judgement is based on selective or comparative processing. This article explores the question of when selective versus comparative processing is likely, and demonstrates that as motivation and opportunity to process information carefully (operationalised as accountability and time pressure, respectively) decrease, the likelihood of selective processing increases. Moreover, we document how individuals manage to render judgements when in selective processing mode by relying on categorical knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Multi-level Account of Selective Attention.John T. Serences & Sabine Kastner - 2014 - In Anna C. Nobre & Sabine Kastner (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Attention. Oxford University Press.
Selective visual processing with tilt and color cues.Gordon D. Logan - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (6):463-465.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-29

Downloads
46 (#342,542)

6 months
4 (#1,055,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Editorial.Valerie Thompson - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (1):1-4.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Features of similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.

Add more references