Why We Don’t Need “Unmet Needs”! On the Concepts of Unmet Need and Severity in Health-Care Priority Setting
Health Care Analysis 27 (1):26-44 (2019)
AbstractIn health care priority setting different criteria are used to reflect the relevant values that should guide decision-making. During recent years there has been a development of value frameworks implying the use of multiple criteria, a development that has not been accompanied by a structured conceptual and normative analysis of how different criteria relate to each other and to underlying normative considerations. Examples of such criteria are unmet need and severity. In this article these crucial criteria are conceptually clarified and analyzed in relation to each other. We argue that disease-severity and condition-severity should be distinguished and we find the latter concept better reflects underlying normative values. We further argue that unmet need does not fulfil an independent and relevant role in relation to condition-severity except for in some limited situations when having to distinguish between conditions of equal severity.
Similar books and articles
Key concepts for estimating the burden of surgical conditions and the unmet need for surgical care.S. Bickler, D. Ozgediz, R. Gosselin, T. Weiser, D. Spiegel, R. Hsia, P. Dunbar, K. McQueen & D. Jamison - unknown
An Ethical Analysis of International Health Priority-Setting.Nuala Kenny & Christine Joffres - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (2):145-160.
Disease Control Priorities for Neglected Tropical Diseases: Lessons from Priority Ranking Based on the Quality of Evidence, Cost Effectiveness, Severity of Disease, Catastrophic Health Expenditures, and Loss of Productivity.Elisabeth Marie Strømme, Kristine Bærøe & Ole Frithjof Norheim - 2014 - Developing World Bioethics 14 (3):132-141.
Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (4):309-323.
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries.Lindsay M. Sabik & Reidar K. Lie - unknown
Shaping Biomedical Research Priorities: The Case of the National Institutes of Health. [REVIEW]Daniel Callahan - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (2):115-129.
Philosophical Approaches to Health Care Priority Setting: Moral Obligations, Practical Realities.Jennifer Lynn Gibson - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
The Significance of the Goal of Health Care for the Setting of Priorities.Per-Erik Liss - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (2):161-169.
Priority setting in health care: trends and models from Scandinavian experiences. [REVIEW]Bjørn Hofmann - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):349-356.
Ethics of resource allocation: instruments for rational decision making in support of a sustainable health care.Claudia Wild - 2005 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):296-309.
Measuring needs for priority setting in healthcare planning and policy.Anders Herlitz & David Horan - 2016 - Social Science and Medicine 157:96-102.
A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Developing Countries.Lydia Kapiriri & Douglas K. Martin - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (3):159-167.
Equality, Explicitness, Severity, and Rigidity: The Oregon Plan Evaluated from a Scandinavian Perspective.L. F. Hansson, O. F. Norheim & K. W. Ruyter - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):343-366.
A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions.Doug Martin & Peter Singer - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):59-68.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.Mathias Barra, Mari Broqvist, Erik Gustavsson, Martin Henriksson, Niklas Juth, Lars Sandman & Carl Tollef Solberg - 2019 - Health Care Analysis 1:1-20.
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.Mathias Barra, Mari Broqvist, Erik Gustavsson, Martin Henriksson, Niklas Juth, Lars Sandman & Carl Tollef Solberg - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 28 (1):25-44.
References found in this work
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics.Norman Daniels - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (5):256-282.
Equality or Priority?Derek Parfit - 2002 - In Matthew Clayton & Andrew Williams (eds.), The Ideal of Equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 81-125.