"Concerning Therapeutic (For Humans) Research With Animals: A Response to Nelson's" Xenograft and Partical Affections"

Between the Species 2 (3):12 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,455

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

"Response to Nelson's" Xenograft and Partial Affections".Connie Kagan - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (3):11.
"A Commentary On Nelson's" Xenograft and Partial Affections".William Aiken - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (3):10.
Steve F. Sapontzis, Morals, Reason, and Animals. [REVIEW]Frank De Roose - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8:110-113.
Xenograft and Partial Affections.James A. Nelson - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (3):5.
On the Relevance of Marginal Humans: A Reply to Sapontzis.Evelyn Pluhar - 1988 - Between the Species 4 (2):5.
"Comment on James Nelson's" Animals in 'Exemplary'Medical Research: Diabetes as a Case Study".Lawrence Finsen - 1989 - Between the Species 5 (4):6.
Review of: Steve F. Sapontzis (ed.), Food for Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat. [REVIEW]Michael Allen Fox - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (2):264.
Book Review:Morals, Reasons, and Animals. S. F. Sapontzis. [REVIEW]R. G. Frey - 1989 - Ethics 100 (1):191-.
Response to Sapontzis.D. D. Todd - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (June):566-568.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-06

Downloads
38 (#698,473)

6 months
1 (#1,668,911)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references