On justifying the exploitation of animals in research

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):177-196 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In research employing animals we commonly do things to them which would be grossly immoral to do to humans. This paper discusses three possible justifications for so treating animals: (a) it is violating the autonomy of rational beings which makes actions immoral, and animals are not autonomous; (b) due to our participation in the human community, we have special obligations to humans that we do not have to animals; and (c) human life is morally more worthy than animal life. The conclusion of this discussion is that none of these three propositions justifies the routine sacrifice of animal interests for human benefit. Particular attention is paid to the idea that human life is morally more worthy than animal life, because I believe that to be the most common justification for our sacrifice of animal interests in research. The claim of greater worth is considered and criticized from both utilitarian and Kantian perspectives, and the inference from superior worth to being entitled to exploit one's inferiors is also criticized. The paper concludes by recommending a governing principle for research with animals which would bring that research into line with the rejection of hierarchical worldviews, social orders, and value systems which characterizes modern moral progress. Keywords: animal rights, animal research, moral worth, moral superiority, moral community, fairness CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,894

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction: The Challenge of Animal Ethics.Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey - 2018 - In Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey, The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan Uk. pp. 1-22.
Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research.David Degrazia & Jeff Sebo - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):420-430.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
The moral equality of humans and animals.Mark H. Bernstein - 2015 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sinking the research lifeboat.Susan Finsen - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):197-212.
Animal experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock, The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-19

Downloads
102 (#222,576)

6 months
7 (#633,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Killing for knowledge.Tzachi Zamir - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):17–40.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references