Biological Theory 10 (3):237-245 (2015)

Isabella Sarto-Jackson
University of Vienna
Suspicion of “physics envy” surrounds the standard statistical toolbox used in the empirical sciences, from biology to psychology. Mainstream methods in these fields, various lines of criticism point out, often fall short of the basic requirements of measurement. Quantitative scales are applied to variables that can hardly be treated as measurable magnitudes, like preferences or happiness; hypotheses are tested by comparing data with conventional significance thresholds that hardly mention effect sizes. This article discusses what I call “shmeasurement.” To “shmeasure” is to fail to apply quantitative tools to quantitative questions. We “shmeasure” when we try to measure what cannot be measured, or, conversely, when we ask binary questions of continuous measurements. Following the critics of standard statistical tools, it is argued that our statistical toolbox is indeed less concerned with the measurement of magnitudes than we take it to be. This article adds, however, that measurement is not all there is to scientific activity. Most techniques of proof do not resemble measurement as much as voting—a practice that makes frequent use of numbers, figures, or measurements, yet is not chiefly concerned with assessing quantities. Measurement is only one among three functions of the scientific toolbox, the other two being collating observations and deciding which hypotheses to relinquish. I thus make a plea for “shmeasurement”: the mismeasure of things starts to make more sense once we take into account the nonquantitative side of scientific practice
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13752-015-0217-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Social Measurement: What Stands in its Way?Martin Bulmer - 2001 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 68.
Theory and Measurement.Henry E. Kyburg (ed.) - 1984 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Meinong on Magnitudes and Measurement.Ghislain Guigon - 2005 - Meinong Studies 1:255-296.
Theory and Measurement.Henry Ely Kyburg Jr - 1984 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ontological Aspects of Measurement.Holger Andreas - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (3):379-394.
Numbers as Quantitative Relations and the Traditional Theory of Measurement.Joel Michell - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):389-406.
Fundamental Measurement: Some Lessons From Classical Physics.Elton Ray Davis - 1980 - Dissertation, University of California, Riverside


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,048,373 of 2,461,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,382 of 2,461,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes