Abstract
In this paper I develop a critique of the strong adaptationist view inherent in the work of Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, as presentedat the Ruffin Lectures series in 2002. My critique proceeds in two stages. In the first stage, I advance arguments as to why I find the particular adaptation story that the authors advance for their experimental results unpersuasive even when I fully accept the value of their experimental results. In the second stage, I grant them their adaptation story and critique the implications of such stories forbusiness ethics and for future research. In sum, I argue against recasting key problems in the social sciences to fit the use of toolsdeveloped in the so-called “hard” sciences. Instead, I urge that we deal with these problems on their own terms, i.e. through their basisin and dependence on deliberate social action.
Keywords Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1949-0232
DOI ruffinx2004410
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,488
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Founding Moral Reasoning on Evolutionary Psychology.Saras D. Sarasvathy - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:135-144.
The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating: A Response to Buller's Critique.John Klasios - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:1-11.
Evolution, Psychology, and Culture.Bogdan Boghițoi - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (3):383-404.
The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating: A Response to Buller's Critique.John Klasios - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:1-11.
Can Evolutionary Psychology Learn From the Instinct Debate?Simon J. Hampton - 2006 - History of the Human Sciences 19 (4):57-74.
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail.Jonathan Haidt - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):814-834.
Knowing Thyself: The Evolutionary Psychology of Moral Reasoning and Moral Sentiments.Leda Cosmides - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:93-128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
5 ( #1,093,762 of 2,326,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #641,093 of 2,326,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes