How to be responsible for something without causing it

Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):315–336 (2004)
What is the relationship between moral responsibility and causation? Plainly, we are not morally responsible for everything that we cause. For we cause a multitude of things, including things that we couldn't possibly foresee we would cause and with respect to which we cannot be assessed morally. Thus, it is clear that causing something does not entail being morally responsible for it. But, does the converse entailment hold? Does moral responsibility require causation? Intuitively, it does: intuitively, we can only be morally responsible for things that we cause.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00031.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Proportionality, Contrast and Explanation.Brad Weslake - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):785-797.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
82 ( #66,333 of 2,199,498 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #44,378 of 2,199,498 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature