Economic Annals-XXI 9 (2):4-7 (2014)
AbstractThe state of national economies development varies and is characterized by many indicators. Economically developed countries are known as doubtless leaders that are in progress and form political stability, social and economics standards, scientific and technical progress and determine future priorities. It is worth mentioning that the progressive development of national economies in conditions of globalization can take place only in case of the increase of their intellectualization level, through saturation of people`s life, economic relations and production by brain activity, knowledge, creativity, innovation, culture, ethical considering of the historical heritage. The main aim of the research is national economies intellectualization evaluating in globalization conditions. In order to gain this aim, the following tasks were defined: to identify existing indices of the national economies intellectualization level evaluation, develop the authors’ methodological approach to the national economies intellectualization level, determine the areas of measurement results application. While conducting the research, systematic approach, the methods of analysis, synthesis, grouping, abstracting, generalization, imaginary experiment and grounding were used. In the modern world, there are a large number of indicators which characterize differences in intellectual state of the national economy. When comparing the state of national economies intellectualization, the problems arise with different number of countries, duplication of indicators, disproportionate number of the components of indicators, various years of publication, etc. Therefore, to ensure comparability, we choose four general indicators – the index of human development, the global innovation index, the global competitiveness index and the knowledge economy index. Using these indices, we do the research and determine the state of national economies intellectualization in the world economy. According to the calculated results, as of 2013, we have divided 190 national economies by level of intellectualization into five groups: countries with the highest (30 countries), high (30 (countries), low (30 countries), the lowest (35 countries) and the countries with uncertain state of intellectualization (65 countries). The leaders in the state of intellectualization are Switzerland, Sweden, The Netherlands, Finland and the USA. The countries with the highest level of intellectualization serve as an example to all other countries of the world. These countries are characterized by developed market economy; a dominant position in the international economy, which allows actively engaging own and imported resources in the economic turnover; the shift of the center of gravity of economic activity into the services sector and the dominance of service economy; the greatest exhaustion of sources and factors of industrial development; advanced post-industrial development. The economic policy of the first group of countries has a decisive influence on the state and dynamics of the global economy, defining the main directions of its scientific and technological development and structural adjustment. The average index of the national economy intellectualization (AINEI), calculated by the authors, shows the place of each country in the world community as to their intellectual capital. Considering the continued deployment of R&D progress, the growing role of high-tech production and the complexity of social and economic relations, AINEI can serve as a reliable indicator of the macroeconomic environment intellectualization state. Therefore, the following organizations, bodies and individuals can use the comparative results of this study: the international organizations while developing international economic development programs; the state authorities of the countries in foreign and domestic policy forming; companies that create innovative and investment policy; migrants, tourists and persons who perform professional and transit activity for the formation of human potential and capital; scientists and teachers who develop mechanisms of intellectualization.
Similar books and articles
Evaluating the State of Intellectualization of the National Economy of Ukraine in the Context of Globalization.Sergii Sardak & A. A. Samoylenko S. E. Sardak - 2014 - Бізнесінформ 12:19-24.
The influence of global intellectualization on human development.Sergii Sardak & A. Samoilenko S. Sardak - 2019 - Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Economic Sciences, 1:176-182.
Global Economic Integration in Developing Countries: The Role of Corruption and Human Capital Investment.Charles E. Bryant & Rajshekhar G. Javalgi - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 136 (3):437-450.
U.S. Trade Relations with Arab Countries: Past, Present, and Future.Bashar H. Malkawi - 2009 - Global Jurist 9:1-54.
Global innovations in tourism.Sergii Sardak & A. Samoilenko S. Sardak, V. Dzhyndzhoian - 2016 - Innovative Marketing 12 (3):45 – 50.
Global Regulatory System of Human Resources Development.Sergii Sardak - 2014 - Dissertation, Київський Національний Економічний Університет Імені Вадима Гетьмана
Economic trade between Australia and India: A case study of foreign direct investment.Srabani Roy Choudhury - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 105 (1):79-93.
Методологічні засади вирішення проблем інформаційного суспільства.M. O. Kyrychenko - 2018 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 72:53-61.
Village Economies: The Design, Estimation, and Use of Villagewide Economic Models.J. Edward Taylor & Irma Adelman - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Information and communication technologies as an indicator of development of a knowledge economy.V. V. Makarov & T. A. Blatova - 2014 - Liberal Arts in Russia 3 (4):275--281.
Risposte nazionali e regionali alla globalizzazione.Irina Stoica - 2013 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 25 (49).
From "Learning by Doing" to "Learning by Assembling"-International Production Specialization, Technology Diffusion and Independent Technology Innovation in the Situation of Globalization.Jia-Dong Tong & Zhi-wei Peng - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:71-81.
Economies, Technology, and the Structure of Human Living.James B. Sauer - 1995 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (4):22-28.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Проблематика безробіття у глобальному та національному вимірах.Sergii Sardak & Ю. С. Бєліч С. Е. Сардак - 2018 - Економіка Та Суспільство 17:490-495.
References found in this work
No references found.