Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:43-56 (2015)
AbstractThis paper attempts a critical reappraisal of Nagel's (1961, 1970) model of reduction taking into account both traditional criticisms and recent defenses. This model treats reduction as a type of explanation in which a reduced theory is explained by a reducing theory after their relevant representational items have been suitably connected. In accordance with the deductive-nomological model, the explanation is supposed to consist of a logical deduction. Nagel was a pluralist about both the logical form of the connections between the reduced and reducing theories (which could be conditionals or biconditionals) and their epistemological status (as analytic connections, conventions, or synthetic claims). This paper defends Nagel's pluralism on both counts and, in the process, argues that the multiple realizability objection to reductionism is misplaced. It also argues that the Nagel model correctly characterizes reduction as a type of explanation. However, it notes that logical deduction must be replaced by a broader class of inferential techniques that allow for different types of approximation. Whereas Nagel (1970), in contrast to his earlier position (1961), recognized the relevance of approximation, he did not realize its full import for the model. Throughout the paper two case studies are used to illustrate the arguments: the putative reduction of classical thermodynamics to the kinetic theory of matter and that of classical genetics to molecular biology.
Similar books and articles
Introduction: Formal epistemology and the legacy of logical empiricism.Sahotra Sarkar & Thomas Uebel - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:1-2.
Future Generations and Interpersonal Compensations: Moral Aspects of Energy Use.Gustaf Arrhenius & Krister Bykvist - manuscript
Potentiality, Entanglement, and Passion-at-a-Distance: Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony.Robert Sonné Cohen, Michael Horne & John J. Stachel (eds.) - 1997 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Review of Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. [REVIEW]Greg Frost-Arnold - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).
Comments on two epistemological theses of Thomas Kuhn.Abner Shimony - 1976 - In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. pp. 569--588.
Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. Festschrift in Honour of John Stachel.Abhay Ashtekar, Jürgen Renn, Don Howard, Abner Shimony & S. Sarkar (eds.) - 2002 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The epistemology of special majority voting: Why the proportion is special only in special conditions.Christian List - unknown
Comments on the Papers of Brush and Tisza.Abner Shimony - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:609 - 616.
Nancy Cartwright, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck, and Thomas E. Uebel Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics Thomas E. Uebel Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within. [REVIEW]Thomas Mormann - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):306-309.
The empirical inadequacy of species cohesion by Gene flow.Matthew J. Barker - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):654-665.
Comments on the papers of prof. S. Schiller and prof. A. Siegel.Abner Shimony - 1962 - Synthese 14 (2-3):189 - 192.
Counterfactual logic and the Hardy paradox: Remarks on Shimony and Stein's criticism of Stapp's proof.Tomasz Bigaj - unknown
On the Austrian Roots of Logical Empiricism. The Case of the First Vienna Circle.Thomas Uebel - 2003 - In Paolo Parrini, Wes Salmon & Merrilee Salmon (eds.), Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Pittsburgh University Pres. pp. 67--93.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Scientific Reduction.Raphael van Riel & Robert Van Gulick - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
In Defense of Levels: Layer Cakes and Guilt by Association.Daniel S. Brooks - 2017 - Biological Theory 12 (3).
Two-step emergence: the quantum theory of atoms in molecules as a bridge between quantum mechanics and molecular chemistry.Chérif F. Matta, Olimpia Lombardi & Jesús Jaimes Arriaga - 2020 - Foundations of Chemistry 22 (1):107-129.
Coherence and Reduction.Andrea Giuseppe Ragno - 2022 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):51-81.
References found in this work
Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis).J. A. Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97-115.
Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.Paul Oppenheim & Hilary Putnam - 1958 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:3-36.
1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (3):335-373.