Robert Boyle's Baconian inheritance: A response to Laudan's Cartesian thesis

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (4):469-486 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Boyle, classification and the workmanship of the understanding thesis.Jan-Erik Jones - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Robert Boyle and the masculine methods of science.Rose-Mary Sargent - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):857-867.
Bad arguments against a good case (Laudan's attack on the strong programme).Márta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):233-238.
Why Does Laudan’s Confutation of Convergent Realism Fail?Antonio Diéguez-Lucena - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):393 - 403.
Robert Boyle on things above reason.Thomas Holden - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):283 – 312.
Robert Boyle's epistemology: The interaction between scientific and religious knowledge.J. J. MacIntosh - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):91 – 121.


Added to PP

30 (#519,519)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Larry Laudan’s Typology for Historical Methodology and the Historical and Experimental Turns in Philosophy of Science.Jutta Schickore - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):87-107.
Explaining the Success of Science.Rose-Mary Sargent - 1988 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988 (1):55-63.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Francis Bacon: discovery and the art of discourse.Lisa Jardine - 1974 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
John Locke and the Changing Ideal of Scientific Knowledge.Margaret J. Osler - 1970 - Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (1):3.
In defence of Francis Bacon. A criticism of the critics of the Inductive Method.Mary Horton - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (3):241-278.

View all 8 references / Add more references