Synchronic vs. diachronic emergence: a reappraisal

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (1):31-54 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I put forward a benchmark account of emergence in terms of non-explainability and explicate the relationship that exists between its synchronic and diachronic declinations. I develop an argument whose conclusion is that emergence is essentially a “two-faceted” notion, i.e. it always encapsulates both synchronic and diachronic dimensions. I then compare this account with alternative recent accounts of emergence that define the concept through the notion of unpredictability or topological non-equivalence

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,952

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-15

Downloads
82 (#154,352)

6 months
5 (#168,645)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Olivier Sartenaer
University of Namur

Citations of this work

Sixteen Years Later: Making Sense of Emergence (Again).Olivier Sartenaer - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (1):79-103.
Emergence within social systems.Kenneth Silver - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):7865-7887.
Emergent Evolutionism, Determinism and Unpredictability.Olivier Sartenaer - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:62-68.
Appearance and Persistence as the Unity of Diachronic and Synchronic Concepts of Emergence.Vladimír Havlík - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (3):393-409.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations