Teleological arguments and theory-based dialectics

Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):95-112 (2002)
Abstract
This paper proposes to model legal reasoning asdialectical theory-constructiondirected by teleology. Precedents are viewed asevidence to be explained throughtheories. So, given a background of factors andvalues, the parties in a case canbuild their theories by using a set of operators,which are called theory constructors.The objective of each party is to provide theoriesthat both explain the evidence (theprecedents) and support the decision wished by thatparty. This leads to theory-basedargumentation, i.e., a dialectical exchange ofcompeting theories, which support opposedoutcomes by explaining the same evidence and appealingto the same values. The winneris the party that can reply with a more coherent theoryto all theories of its adversary.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1019589831118
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Legal Case-Based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):93-131.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
16 ( #303,273 of 2,180,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,817 of 2,180,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums