Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):93-101 (2017)

Authors
Sara Protasi
University of Puget Sound
Abstract
In this paper, I ask whether there is a defensible philosophical view according to which everybody is beautiful. I review two purely aesthetical versions of this claim. The No Standards View claims that everybody is maximally and equally beautiful. The Multiple Standards View encourages us to widen our standards of beauty. I argue that both approaches are problematic. The former fails to be aspirational and empowering, while the latter fails to be sufficiently inclusive. I conclude by presenting a hybrid ethical–aesthetical view according to which everybody is beautiful in the sense that everybody can be perceived through a loving gaze. I show that this view is inclusive, aspirational and empowering, and authentically aesthetical.
Keywords love  normative standards  beauty  feminist philosophy  bodily beauty
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/tht3.236
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Robust Immoralism.A. W. Eaton - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3):281-292.
Body Aesthetics.Sherri Irvin (ed.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Body and Beauty's Ideal.Jože Hrovat - 2002 - Phainomena 39.
Athletic Beauty in Classical Greece: A Philosophical View.Heather Reid - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (2):281-297.
Nehamas on Beauty and Love.Berys Gaut - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):199-204.
Is Beauty a Pure Perfection?Raphael Bexten - 2010 - Sammelpunkt. Elektronisch Archivierte Theorie.
Beauty in Mulla Sadra's View.Ali Afrasiyabpur - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 51.
Beauty Matters.Peg Zeglin Brand (ed.) - 2000 - Indiana University Press.
Beauty Unlimited.Peg Zeglin Brand (ed.) - 2013 - Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Loving People for Who They Are (Even When They Don't Love You Back).Sara Protasi - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):214-234.
Beauty.Rafael De Clercq - 2013 - In Berys Gaut Gaut & Dominic Lopes (eds.), Routledge Companion to Aesthetics 3rd Edition. Routledge.
Symposium: Beauty Matters.Peg Zeglin Brand - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1):1-10.
The Aesthetic Life.Hung-en Hsiao - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (6):127-141.
Beauty in Hegel's Anthropology and Philosophy of Art.Julia Peters - 2013 - Idealistic Studies 43 (1-2):87-110.
The Anti-Platonic Affinity Between Nietzsche and Dostoevsky.Paul Kindlon - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
St. Thomas Aquinas on Beauty.Albert Chao - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (5):165-170.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-24

Total views
571 ( #12,354 of 2,448,695 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #11,688 of 2,448,695 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes