Sophia 59 (4):637-649 (2020)

Mark Satta
Wayne State University
Mark Murphy has argued that the relationship between a creator and their creatures is not a special relationship that generates new moral obligations for the creator. Murphy’s position is grounded, in part, on his claim that there are no good arguments to the contrary and that the creator-creature relationship is not a relationship between equals. I argue that there are good reasons to think that a creator and creature being equals is not required for such an obligation. I offer an argument for such an obligation based on the moral significance of thrusting upon sentient or rational beings significant, unsought, and wholly new circumstances. More specifically, I argue that it is reasonable to conclude that a creator enters into a duty-generating special relationship with their creatures to promote their creatures’ well-being, when the creator is the voluntary source of the creatures’ wholly new and unconsented to circumstances from which to flourish or languish and it would cost the creator virtually nothing to promote the creatures’ welfare.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-020-00796-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Introduction.David Benatar & Archard & David - 2010 - In David Archard & David Benatar (eds.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford University Press.
Procreation and Parental Responsibility.Jeffrey Blustein - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (2):79-86.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Proximity Matters for the Concept of Supererogation.Simone Grigoletto - 2017 - Etica and Politica / Ethics and Politics 19 (1):291-307.
Four Theories of Filial Duty.Simon Keller - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):254 - 274.
Dog Duty.Rebecca Hanrahan - 2007 - Society and Animals 15 (4):379-399.
The Duty to Let Others Do Their Duty.Robert E. Goodin - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 24 (1):1-10.
Is Patriotism an Associative Duty?Margaret Moore - 2009 - The Journal of Ethics 13 (4):383-399.
Once Again, Creator/Creature.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 1981 - Philosophia Reformata 46:60.
Creator and Creature.William H. Kimball - 1884 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (2):214 - 215.
Creator and Creature: Atonement: Its Means and Its Method.Edwin Lewis - 1950 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 4 (2):143-155.
Families, Friends, and Special Obligations.Diane Jeske - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):527 - 555.
Nicolás de Cusa o la recuperación del Universo.Mariano Brasa Díez - 1996 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 13 (S1):129-136.
Los pilares del "De Docta Ignorantia" de Nicolás de Cusa.Mariano Brasa Díez - 1989 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 7:129.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #376,760 of 2,448,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #177,278 of 2,448,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes