Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):413-414 (2004)

Grush's emulation theory comprises both modality-specific and amodal emulators. I suggest that the amodal variety be replaced by multisensory emulators. The key distinction is that multisensory processing retains the characteristics of individual sensory modalities, in contrast to amodal processing. The latter term is better reserved for conceptual and linguistic systems, rather than perception or emulation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x04390096
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Europe—Quo Vadis?Hans-Viktor Schierwater - 1990 - World Futures 29 (3):158-163.
Amodal Imagery in Rostral Premotor Areas.Takashi Hanakawa, Manabu Honda & Mark Hallett - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):406-407.
Two Distinctions Concerning Emulators.Mark Wexler - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):422-422.
Representing the Impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Quo Vadis, Systems Thought?James E. Huchingson - 1985 - Zygon 20 (4):435-444.
Quo Vadis: Society for Business Ethics.C. Leo V. Ryan - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):883-893.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #947,267 of 2,498,932 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,932 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes