Heidelberg: ART-Dok (2014)

Martina Sauer
Institute for Image and Cultural Philosophy
Do abstract paintings still make sense and if so what do they mean? By reducing the paintings to simple square blots as by Cézanne, to lines as by van Gogh and color traces as by Monet their meaning is fundamentally questioned. But by interpreting these compositions as effective forces or rather affective stimuli a new and different meaning becomes apparent. Landscapes are no longer introduced but made real in the aesthetic experience. Therefore aesthetics or rather aisthetics (perception) can be defined as a notion of experience and knowledge. Thus the notion of an image gets a new understanding: it can be described as an "energetic system".
Keywords phaenomenology  semiotics  genesis of abstraction  art history  Bildwissenschaft
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Adversity and Practices of Painting.Véronique M. Fóti - 2016 - Philosophy Today 60 (2):397-405.
Cezanne's Eye and Merleau-Ponty's Spirit.M. Holubova - 2001 - Filozofia 56 (7):474-484.
Les Constructeurs.Elie Faure - 1921 - G. Crès & Cie.


Added to PP index

Total views
145 ( #70,664 of 2,438,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #16,886 of 2,438,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes