Reason and Intuition in the Moral Life: A Dual-Process Account of Moral Justification

In Jonathan Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 335--354 (2009)

Authors
Leland F. Saunders
Seattle Pacific University
Abstract
This chapter explores how morality can be rational if moral intuitions are resistant to rational reflection. There are two parts to this question. The normative problem is whether there is a model of moral justification which can show that morality is a rational enterprise given the facts of moral dumbfounding. Appealing to the model of reflective equilibrium for the rational justification of moral intuitions solves this problem. Reflective equilibrium views the rational justification of morality as a back-and-forth balancing between moral theory and moral intuition, and therefore does not require that individual moral intuitions be directly responsive to rational reflection. The psychological problem is whether human psychology actually implements the processes required for reflective equilibrium. The psychological problem is far more difficult, and requires appealing to a dual-process view of moral judgement that regards moral intuitions and moral theories as belonging to different mental systems.
Keywords Moral Psychology  Intuition  Moral Dumbfounding
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,305
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning.Keith Frankish - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):914-926.
Evolution and the Possibility of Moral Realism. [REVIEW]Peter Carruthers & Scott M. James - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):237-244.
What is Moral Reasoning?Leland F. Saunders - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (1):1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-27

Total views
76 ( #113,037 of 2,280,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #308,196 of 2,280,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature