Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (3):307-321 (2014)

Jennifer Saul
University of Waterloo
This article explores two related widespread mistakes in thinking about sexual harassment. One is a mistake made by philosophers doing philosophical work on the topic of sexual harassment: an excessive focus on attempting to define the term ‘sexual harassment’. This is a perfectly legitimate topic for discussion and indeed a necessary one, but its dominance of the literature has tended to prevent philosophers from adequately exploring other topics that are of at least equal importance, particularly that of bystanders' responsibilities. The other mistake is one made not just by philosophers but by most people attempting to deal with real-world behaviour that is either sexual harassment or closely related to sexual harassment: an excessive focus on whether or not formal charges of sexual harassment are possible or appropriate. (This is clearly related to the first mistake in that a part of deciding whether charges are appropriate is deciding whether the behaviour meets the definition of sexual harassment.) I argue that these are not merely unfortunate errors in attempting to conceptualise certain problematic behaviours; they have extremely damaging real world effects
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12058
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

#MeToo, Social Norms, and Sanctions.Katharina Berndt Rasmussen & Nicolas Olsson Yaouzis - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (3):273-295.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Sexual Harassment Be Salvaged?M. J. Booker - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1171-1177.
Sexual Harassment in Public Places.Margaret Crouch - 2009 - Social Philosophy Today 25:137-148.
On the Persistence of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace.S. Gayle Baugh - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):899-908.
Sexual Harassment in the Public Accounting Profession?Brian B. Stanko & Mark Schneider - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):185 - 200.
Sexual Harassment and the "Repetition Requirement".Iddo Landau - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):79-83.


Added to PP index

Total views
156 ( #70,687 of 2,462,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,571 of 2,462,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes