Behavioural genetics: Why eugenic selection is preferable to enhancement

Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):157–171 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider whether intervening in the criminal tendency of future children is ethically justifiable. We argue that, if avoidance of

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#277,782)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Gene editing, identity and benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
Gene Editing, Identity and Benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
A Not‐So‐New Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):32-42.
Physicians' Duties and the Non-Identity Problem.Tony Hope & John McMillan - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):21 - 29.
Liberalism and eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The non-identity problem.James Woodward - 1986 - Ethics 96 (4):804-831.
Harming future people.Matthew Hanser - 1990 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1):47-70.
When Is Birth Unfair to the Child?Bonnie Steinbock & Ron McClamrock - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (6):15-21.
The Moral Significance of the Therapy-Enhancement Distinction in Human Genetics.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):365-377.

View all 7 references / Add more references