Utilitas 19 (1):1-20 (2007)
I argue that pregnant women have a duty to refrain from behaviours or to allow certain acts to be done to them for the sake of their foetus if the foetus has a reasonable chance of living and being in a harmed state if the woman does not refrain from those behaviours or allow those things to be done to her. There is a proviso: that her refraining from acting or allowing acts to be performed upon her does not significantly harm her. This duty does not presuppose that the foetus is a person. It is grounded on principles of respect for the interests of sentient beings and prevention of harm to future individuals. I give an argument for a general duty of easy rescue
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Homebirth and the Future Child.L. de Crespigny & J. Savulescu - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (12):807-812.
Foetal Surgery and Using in Utero Therapies to Reduce the Degree of Disability After Birth. Could It Be Morally Defensible or Even Morally Required?Constantinos Kanaris - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):131-146.
Similar books and articles
The Rule of Rescue in Clinical Practice.Jonathan Hughes & Tom Walker - 2009 - Clinical Ethics 4 (1):50-54.
The Bystander's Duty to Rescue in Jewish Law.Aaron Kirschenbaum - 1980 - Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (2):204 - 226.
Medical Samaritans: Is There A Duty To Treat?Kevin Williams - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (3):393-413.
The Patient's Duty to Adhere to Prescribed Treatment: An Ethical Analysis.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
Analogical Reasoning and Easy Rescue Cases.Thomas Young - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:327-339.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #76,175 of 2,158,310 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #87,239 of 2,158,310 )
How can I increase my downloads?