Germline edits: Trust ethics review process

Nature 520 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Summary: Edward Lanphier and colleagues contend that human germline editing is an unethical technology because it could have unpredictable effects on future generations. In our view, such misgivings do not justify their proposed moratorium.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Duty to Edit the Human Germline.Parker Crutchfield - 2022 - Res Publica 29 (3):347-365.
Genome Editing for Longer Lives: The Problem of Loneliness.C. S. Wareham - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):309-314.
Germline Gene Editing Applications and the Afro-communitarian Ubuntu Philosophy.Cornelius Ewuoso - 2023 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 12 (1):1-12.
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-15

Downloads
473 (#48,706)

6 months
117 (#54,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Chris Gyngell
Australian National University
Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references