- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children
Bioethics 15 (5-6):413-426 (2001)
Abstract
We have a reason to use information which is available about such genes in our reproductive decision-making; (3) couples should selecAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (3):43-59.
Beneficence, determinism and justice: An engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence.Kean Birch - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (1):12–28.
Are some controversial views in bioethics Juvenalian satire without irony?Matti Häyry - 2023 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 44 (2):177-189.
The proper scope of the principle of procreative beneficence revisited.Søren Holm & Rebecca Bennett - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):22-32.
In defence of Procreative Beneficence.J. Savulescu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):284-288.
On Our Obligation to Select the Best Children: A Reply to Savulescu.Inmaculada de Melo-MartÍn - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (1):72-83.
On our obligation to select the best children: A reply to Savulescu.Inmaculada De Melo-Martín - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (1):72–83.
The Lack of an Obligation to Select the Best Child: Silencing the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.Peter N. Herissone-Kelly - 2016 - In Kristien Hens, Daniela Cutas & Dorothee Horstkötter (eds.), Parental Responsibility in the Context of Neuroscience and Genetics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 153-166.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-01
Downloads
1,518 (#8,504)
6 months
126 (#47,956)
2010-09-01
Downloads
1,518 (#8,504)
6 months
126 (#47,956)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
Procreative Beneficence and Genetic Enhancement.Walter Veit - 2018 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):75-92.
Can ‘eugenics’ be defended?Francesca Minerva, Diana S. Fleischman, Peter Singer, Nicholas Agar, Jonathan Anomaly & Walter Veit - 2021 - Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):60-67.
Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-15.
Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.Jeff McMahan & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (8):9-19.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7b7f6c6655-j5lmd uwo