The Inevitability of Death: Going from an Is to an Ought


Authors
Heidi Savage
State University of New York at Geneseo
Abstract
Since Hume, many ethicists have assumed that inferring normative claims from descriptive claims is fallacious. Some classic examples that illustrate this fact are those in which everyone commits some act, but we do not therefore conclude that it is the right thing to do. Everyone may jump off a bridge, asserts your mother, but that does not entail that you should. However, not all such claims illustrate this. In fact, some of them illustrate precisely the opposite claim. For example, consider the person who repeatedly bemoans the unfairness or sadness of dying, and who is often faced with the response that this happens to everyone. What should she do? One plausible response is that she should accept the fact that this occurs and make her peace with it, an unequivocally normative directive. This example, then, is a prima facie counterexample to the infamous gap between is-claims and ought-claims.
Keywords is-ought gap  ought implies can
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Science and Culture.Raphael Sassower - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):499-508.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Structural Irrationality.Thomas Scanlon - 2007 - In Geoffrey Brennan, Robert Goodin, Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), Common Minds: Themes From the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. Clarendon Press.
Justifiability to Each Person.Derek Parfit - 2003 - Ratio 16 (4):368–390.
Searle's Wager.Neil Levy - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (4):363-369.
White on Rights and Claims.Samuel Stoljar - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):101 - 114.
Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle.Hans Radder - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):195-226.
A Big Bang Cosmological Argument?Dennis Temple - 1995 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (2):11-16.
Moral Argument.Jonathan Bennett - 1960 - Mind 69 (276):544-549.
‘Ought’, ‘Can’, and Practical Reasons.Clayton Littlejohn - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):363-73.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature