Religious Hospitals and Patient Choice

Hastings Center Report 46 (6):8-9 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent media reports have drawn widespread attention to the experiences of patients who are denied reproductive services at Catholic hospitals. For some patients, such as those experiencing miscarriage, denial of appropriate treatment can lead to serious health consequences. However, many patients are unaware of the limitations on services available at religiously affiliated health care institutions. As a result, patients’ ability to make informed and autonomous decisions about where to seek treatment is hindered. There are currently no federal or state laws requiring health care institutions to inform patients directly of the full scope of medical services they are unable to provide on the basis of religion or conscience. Given religious hospitals’ significant role in the provision of health care in the United States, it is essential that patients be clearly informed about institutional limitations on care. This goal would be best served by adopting a federal disclosure law similar to the Patient Self-Determination Act.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conscientious Refusals by Hospitals and Emergency Contraception.Mark R. Wicclair - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):130-138.
Understanding and Coping with Diversity in Healthcare.J. Jhutti-Johal - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (3):259-270.
Other Signing and Patients' Rights.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (7):15-30.
Notions of just health care at three Swedish hospitals.Carl-Åke Elmersjö & Gert Helgesson - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):145-151.
Patients and profits.Mark Yarborough - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
The Catalogue of Patients' Duties in Lithuania: The Legal Analysis of Contents.Indrė Špokienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (4):1529-1550.
Free Choice and Patient Best Interests.Emma C. Bullock - 2016 - Health Care Analysis 24 (4):374-392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-23

Downloads
11 (#1,070,627)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references