Economics and Philosophy 13 (1):1-23 (1997)

Authors
Kim Sawyer
University of Melbourne
Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne
Abstract
This paper considers the relevance of the Duhem-Quine thesis in economics. In the introductory discussion which follows, the meaning of the thesis and a brief history of its development are detailed. The purpose of the paper is to discuss the effects of the thesis in four specific and diverse theories in economics, and to illustrate the dependence of testing the theories on a set of auxiliary hypotheses. A general taxonomy of auxiliary hypotheses is provided to demonstrate the confounding of auxiliary hypotheses with the testing of economic theory.
Keywords Quine  Duhem  Underdetermination  Economics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Duhem–Quine Virtue Epistemology.Abrol Fairweather - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):673-692.
Duhem and Quine.Paul Needham - 2000 - Dialectica 54 (2):109-132.
The Duhem‐Quine Thesis Revisited.F. Weinert - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):147 – 156.
On Duhem's and Quine's Theses.Jules Vuillemin - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien Graz 9:69-96.
On Duhem’s and Quine’s Theses.Jules Vuillemin - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 9 (1):69-96.
On Duhem’s and Quine’s Theses.Jules Vuillemin - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 9 (1):69-96.
Theory and Experiment in Molecular Population Genetics.Michael Robert Dietrich - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Evolution of Quine’s Thinking on the Thesis of Underdetermination and Scott Soames’s Accusation of Paradoxicality.M. Ashraf Adeel - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):56-69.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-27

Total views
397 ( #22,327 of 2,456,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #6,627 of 2,456,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes