Analysis 62 (4):289–292 (2002)
It is argued that Convention T and Basic Law V of Frege’s Grungesetze share three striking similarities. First, they are universal generalizations that are intuitively plausible because they have so many obvious instances. Second, both are false because they yield contradictions. Third, neither gives rise to a paradox.
|Keywords||Convention T Basic Law V paradox|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hempel's Paradox, Law-Likeness and Causal Relations.Severin Schroeder - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):244-263.
A Philosophical and Critical Analysis of the European Convention of Bioethics.Gilbert Hottois - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):133 – 146.
Lessons From the Experience of U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Addressing the Democratic Deficit in Global Health Governance.Janet E. Lord, David Suozzi & Allyn L. Taylor - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3):564-579.
Examining the Global Health Arena: Strengths and Weaknesses of a Convention Approach to Global Health Challenges.Just Balstad Haffeld, Harald Siem & John-Arne Røttingen - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3):614-628.
Human is What is Born of a Human: Personhood, Rationality, and an European Convention.Lars Reuter - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):181 – 194.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads91 ( #56,054 of 2,158,842 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,842 )
How can I increase my downloads?