Mill's “proof” of the principle of utility: A more than half-hearted defense*: Geoffrey Sayre-McCord

Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):330-360 (2001)

Authors
Geoffrey Sayre-McCord
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Abstract
How many serious mistakes can a brilliant philosopher make in a single paragraph? Many think that Mill answers this question by example—in the third paragraph of Chapter IV of Utilitarianism. Here is the notorious paragraph: The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible, is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it: and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it. If the end which the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself were not, in theory and in practice, acknowledged to be an end, nothing could ever convince any person that it was so. No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness. This, however, being a fact, we have not only all the proof which the case admits of, but all which it is possible to require, that happiness is a good: that each person's happiness is a good to that person, and the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons. Happiness has made out its title as one of the ends of conduct, and consequently one of the criteria of morality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052500003009
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Taking the Perceptual Analogy Seriously.Michael Milona - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):897-915.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Proof of Utility and Equity in Mill's Utilitarianism.John Marshall - 1973 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):13 - 26.
The Fourth Chapter of Mill's Utilitarianism.John Kleinig - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):197 – 205.
Mill's Proof That Happiness is the Criterion of Morality.Fred Wilson - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):59 - 72.
Mill's Harm Principle as Social Justice.Huodong Li - 2004 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
"Utility".John Broome - 1991 - Economics and Philosophy 7 (1):1-12.
A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility.Necip Fikri Alican - 1994 - Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis
Proof and Sanction in Mill's Utilitarianism.Stephen Cohen - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (4):475 - 487.
J. S. Mill's Utilitarianism.Christopher Alan Hoffman - 1994 - Dissertation, Washington University

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
15 ( #589,936 of 2,286,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #413,560 of 2,286,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature