Williams’ Definition of ‘X is true’

Analysis 30 (3):95-97 (1970)
Abstract
C. J. F, Williams proposed ‘for some p ___ states that p & p’ as a satisfactory analysis of ‘___ is true’. This paper takes issue with this claim.
Keywords C. J. F. Williams  truth
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/30.3.95
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Willing Belief and the Norm of Truth.Eric Funkhouser - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (2):179-95.
Anselm on Truth.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2005 - In Brian Leftow & Brian Davies (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221.
'Means of Communication as Means of Production' Revisited.William Hebblewhite - 2012 - TripleC - Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation 10 (2):203-213.
Prior’s Theory of Truth.Charles Sayward - 1987 - Analysis 47 (2):83-87.
Knowledge Without Truth.Priyedarshi Jetli - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:97-103.
Beyond “Beyond a- and B-Time”.Mikel Burley - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):411-416.
Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth.Alberto Vanzo - 2010 - Kant-Studien 101 (2):147-166.
Reading Bernard Williams.Daniel Callcut (ed.) - 2008 - Routledge.
Added to PP index
2011-02-21

Total downloads
62 ( #86,157 of 2,180,169 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #303,870 of 2,180,169 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums