David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Political Theory 7 (3):349-364 (2008)
This article explores the tensions between cosmopolitanism and sovereignty as a means to conceptualize the ethics of European foreign policy. It starts by discussing the claim that, in order for the EU to play a meaningful role as an international actor, a definition of the common ethical values orienting its political conduct is required. The question of a European federation of states and its ethical conceptualization emerges clearly in some of the philosophical writings of the 17th and 18th centuries. I seek to provide an outline of the main arguments presented by authors such as Saint Pierre, Rousseau and Kant regarding the implications of the emerging difference between cosmopolitanism and the law of nations in the ethics of international relations. The article focuses on the normative significance of the concept of sovereignty as it emerges in modern political philosophy and highlights its tensions with the ideas of moral and political cosmopolitanism. This exploration serves a double function: theoretical and practical. From the theoretical perspective it leads to a better understanding of the tensions involved in conceptualizing a common ethical orientation for the states of Europe. From the practical standpoint it sheds light on some persistent difficulties the European Union faces in trying to move beyond an intergovernmental political arrangement in the field of foreign policy
|Keywords||sovereignty 18th century philosophy cosmopolitanism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lea Ypi (2014). A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):288-312.
Lea Ypi (2010). Natura Daedala Rerum? On the Justification of Historical Progress in Kant’s ‘Guarantee of Perpetual Peace'. Kantian Review 14 (2):103-135.
Similar books and articles
Craig J. Calhoun (2007). Cosmopolitanism and Belonging: From European Integration to Global Hopes and Fears. Routledge.
John Tomasi (2003). Sovereignty, Commerce, and Cosmopolitanism: Lessons From Early America for the Future of the World. Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (1):223-246.
Pauline Kleingeld (2011). Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge University Press.
Edward Song (2010). Subjectivist Cosmopolitanism and the Morality of Intervention. Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (2):137-151.
Charles Barbour & George Pavlich (eds.) (2010). After Sovereignty: On the Question of Political Beginnings. Routledge.
Pauline Kleingeld (1999). Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (3):505-524.
R. J. Holton (2009). Cosmopolitanisms: New Thinking and New Directions. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Robert Fine (2007). Cosmopolitanism. New York.
Added to index2009-10-28
Total downloads89 ( #53,974 of 1,925,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #187,096 of 1,925,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?