Authors
Matthew Scarfone
University of Toronto, Mississauga
Abstract
There has recently been an expansion of anti-abortion measures in the United States. Within these various measures there is a divide over certain exceptions: some States permit abortion for pregnancies caused by rape while other States do not. This paper explores the underlying moral justification for such exceptions. I argue that within the dominant moral framework for reproductive ethics these exceptions are incoherent by their own lights. But this is not a defense of an exceptionless anti-abortion position. Rather, because the typical way of making such exceptions is incoherent, this shows why the anti-abortion movement is dangerous: as these incoherencies are acknowledged, this may lead to ever stricter measures being put in place. I end by suggesting that those who are sympathetic to these exceptions should find it easier to move to a pro-choice position rather than to a more extreme, exceptionless one.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/josp.12366
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):37-65.
Why Abortion is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Sex, Lies, and Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2013 - Ethics 123 (4):717-744.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Abortion, Society, and the Law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Legal But Rare.Andrew Fiala - 2019 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):203-220.
Abortion: Prohibitions and Exceptions.Sheelagh McGuinness - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):70-72.
The Moral Significance of Spontaneous Abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
Sandra Day O'Connor and the Justification of Abortion.Patricia H. Werhane - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
Descartes on God's Ability to Do the Logically Impossible.Richard R. La Croix - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):455-475.
Descartes on God's Ability to Do the Logically Impossible.Richard R. La Croix - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):455 - 475.
The Relevance of Aristotle’s Notion of Equity for the Contemporary Abortion Debate.James M. Jacobs - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:119-132.
The Relevance of Aristotle’s Notion of Equity for the Contemporary Abortion Debate.James M. Jacobs - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:119-132.
Chemical Abortion in Australia.Marcia Riordan - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Substance, Rights, Value, and Abortion.William Simkulet - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (9):1002-1011.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-04

Total views
121 ( #78,096 of 2,385,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
121 ( #4,335 of 2,385,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes