Analogy in Terms of Identity, Equivalence, Similarity, and Their Cryptomorphs

Philosophies 4 (2):32-0 (2019)

Analogy belongs to the class of concepts notorious for a variety of definitions generating continuing disputes about their preferred understanding. Analogy is typically defined by or at least associated with similarity, but as long as similarity remains undefined this association does not eliminate ambiguity. In this paper, analogy is considered synonymous with a slightly generalized mathematical concept of similarity which under the name of tolerance relation has been the subject of extensive studies over several decades. In this approach, analogy can be mathematically formalized in terms of the sequence of binary relations of increased generality, from the identity, equivalence, tolerance, to weak tolerance relations. Each of these relations has cryptomorphic presentations relevant to the study of analogy. The formalism requires only two assumptions which are satisfied in all of the earlier attempts to formulate adequate definitions which met expectations of the intuitive use of the word analogy in general contexts. The mathematical formalism presented here permits theoretical analysis of analogy in the contrasting comparison with abstraction, showing its higher level of complexity, providing a precise methodology for its study and informing philosophical reflection. Also, arguments are presented for the legitimate expectation that better understanding of analogy can help mathematics in establishing a unified and universal concept of a structure.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analogy Among Systems.P. Weingartner - 1979 - Dialectica 33 (3‐4):355-378.
Analogy and Distance.Raimo Tuomela - 1980 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 11 (2):276-291.
The Being of Analogy.Noah Roderick - 2016 - London, U.K.: Open Humanities Press.
Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):63-75.
Analogy and Understanding.Jiri Syrovatka - 2000 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 15 (3):435-450.
Aspects of Analogy.S. M. A. J. A. Creaven - 1958 - Philosophical Studies 8:71-88.
Story Similarity in Arguments From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):190-221.
Analogy and Communication.Enrique Dussel - 2019 - Philosophies 4 (2):31-0.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
A Method for Evaluation of Arguments From Analogy.Bo R. Meinertsen - 2016 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 7 (2):109-123.
Analogy and Comparatism: A Response to G.E.R. Lloyd, Fortunes of Analogy.Raoul Mortley - 2017 - Australasian Philosophical Review 1 (3):250-258.
Similarity, Precedent and Argument From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):217-246.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #647,841 of 2,280,958 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #323,644 of 2,280,958 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature