Are there any inalienable rights?

Ethics 79 (4):309-315 (1969)
The central purpose of the paper is to elucidate the inalienable rights thesis, I.E. That there is at least one inalienable right. Various senses of 'natural right' and 'inalienable' are analyzed so as to further clarify what is or could be the meaning and the truth of that thesis. A widespread confusion between the meaning of the terms 'inalienable natural right' and 'indefeasible natural right' is dispelled. It is concluded that present thinking about inalienable natural rights does not reveal precisely why and in what sense there is such a right. A successful defense of the inalienable rights thesis is suggested
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/291740
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,495
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Terrance McConnell, Inalienable Rights.A. Wertheimer - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (5):541-551.
Natural and Inalienable Rights.William K. Frankena - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):212-232.
Inalienable Rights.Stuart M. Brown Jr - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):192-211.
Are There Inalienable Rights?John O. Nelson - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (250):519 - 524.
Inalienable Rights.Frank J. Leavitt - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (259):115 - 118.
The Nature and Basis of Inalienable Rights.Terrance McConnell - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
24 ( #225,613 of 2,210,575 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #207,690 of 2,210,575 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature