(Ab)using the past for present purposes: Exposing contextual and trans-contextual features of error

Perspectives on Science 10 (4):433-456 (2002)
: This paper is concerned with the claim that epistemic terms and categories are historical entities. The starting point is the observation that recent attempts at historical studies of epistemic terms fail to bridge the gap between history and philosophy proper. I examine whether, and how, it is possible to forge a closer link between historical and philosophical aspects of conceptual analysis. The paper explores possible links by analyzing aspects of the concept of error. A "pragmatic" and a "mentalist" notion of error are identified in current philosophical studies of error: according to the latter, errors can be ascribed only to mental operations, according to the former, errors can also be ascribed to things and processes. The paper then draws on historical accounts of optical instruments to highlight certain presuppositions and implications of these two uses of the term. Contextual features and trans-contextual structures of the notion of error are distinguished. In conclusion, I argue that an intimate link between history and philosophy of science can be forged by an analysis ofthe development of conceptual arrangements which allows for trans- contextual structural aspects while drawing attention to the contextual epistemological and scientific conditions of their re-arrangement
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/106361402322288057
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Error Types.Douglas Allchin - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (1):38-58.
Can a Historian of Science Be a Scientific Realist?Theodore Arabatzis - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S531-.
Going Wrong.Giora Hon - 1995 - Review of Metaphysics 49 (1):3 - 20.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John Macmurray and Contextual Theology.Christopher Lind - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):383-400.
Assessment-Contextual Indexicals.Josh Parsons - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):1 - 17.
Contextualism, Relativism and Ordinary Speakers' Judgments.Martin Montminy - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):341 - 356.
Contextual Hidden Variables Theories and Bell's Inequalities.Abner Shimony - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):25-45.
Commentary on "Error, Malpractice, and the Problem of Universals".Howard Brody - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (3):251-258.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #258,540 of 2,169,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #186,783 of 2,169,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums