Communication and content: Circumstances and consequences of the Habermas-Brandom debate

Abstract
The recent exchange between Robert Brandom and Jürgen Habermas provides an opportunity to compare and contrast some aspects of their systems. Both present broadly inferential accounts of meaning, according to which the content of an expression is determined by its role in an inferential network. Several problems confront such theories of meaning - one of which threatens the possibility of communication because content is relative to an individual's set of beliefs. Brandom acknowledges this problem and provides a solution to it. The point of this paper is to argue that it arises for Habermas's theory as well. I then present several solutions Habermas could adopt and evaluate their feasibility. The result is that Habermas must alter his theory of communicative action by contextualizing the standards for successful communication.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0967255032000050439
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Expression and Meaning.John Searle - 1985 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Robert Brandom on Communication, Reference, and Objectivity.Bernd Prien - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):433-458.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Scorekeeping in a Defective Language Game.Kevin Scharp - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):203-226.
Freedom of Communicative Action.Lawrence B. Solum - 1989 - Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
The Pragmatics of Inferential Content.Wolfram Hinzen - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):157 - 181.
Robert Brandom on Communication, Reference, and Objectivity.Bernd Prien - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):433-458.
Brandom on Communication.Kevin Scharp - forthcoming - In Jason Hannon & Robert Rutland (eds.), Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication. McGill-Queen's University Press.
From the Second to the Third Person and Back Again.Steven Hendley - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:169-188.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
49 ( #110,502 of 2,199,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,199,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature