Condorcet and communitarianism: Boghossian's fallacious inference

Synthese 166 (1):55 - 68 (2009)
Abstract
This paper defends the communitarian account of meaning against Boghossian’s (Wittgensteinian) arguments. Boghossian argues that whilst such an account might be able to accommodate the infinitary characteristic of meaning, it cannot account for its normativity: he claims that, since the dispositions of a group must mirror those of its members, the former cannot be used to evaluate the latter. However, as this paper aims to make clear, this reasoning is fallacious. Modelling the issue with four (justifiable) assumptions, it shows that Condorcet’s ‘Jury Theorem’ can be used to prove that the dispositions of the majority of the members of a group can differ from those of any individual member in a way that makes it possible to use communal dispositions as a standard with which individual dispositions can be assessed. Moreover, the argument of the paper is also shown to have general implications for the use of formal methods in the explanation of the nature of certain fallacious inferences.
Keywords Condorcet’s Jury Theorem  The rule-following considerations  Communitarianism  Dispositionalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9257-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,492
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Semantics, Wisconsin Style.Jerry A. Fodor - 1984 - Synthese 59 (3):231-50.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Benefits of Rule Following: A New Account of the Evolution of Desires.Armin Schulz - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 44 (4a):595-603.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Causation, Laws and Dispositions.Andreas Hüttemann - 2007 - In Max Kistler & Bruno Gnassounou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate.
Understanding and Inference.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):249–293.
Rule-Following, Ideal Conditions and Finkish Dispositions.Andrea Guardo - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (2):195-209.
Lewis on Finkish Dispositions.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):703 - 710.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
79 ( #67,638 of 2,180,638 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,009 of 2,180,638 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums