In Schickore J. & Steinle F. (eds.), Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Max-Planck-Institut. pp. 237-251 (2002)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
With his distinction between the "context of discovery" and the "context of justification", Hans Reichenbach gave the traditional difference between genesis and validity a modern standard formulation. Reichenbach's distinction is one of the well-known ways in which the expression "context" is used in the theory of science. My argument is that Reichenbach's concept is unsuitable and leads to contradictions in the semantic fields of genesis and validity. I would like to demonstrate this by examining the different meanings of Reichenbach's context distinction. My investigation also shows how the difference between genesis and validity precedes Reichenbach's context distinction and indicates approaches for meaningful applications of the concept of context to the phenomena designated by Reichenbach. I will begin by reconstructing the way in which Reichenbach introduces the distinction between discovery and justification as a difference of contexts (I). Drawing on the numerous meanings of the term "context", I will then emphasize some chief characteristics and review, through exemplification, the usage of this term. First of all, I turn to the context of discovery as the nonrational part of all scientific knowledge and show that this meaning cannot be defined consistently (la). For the context of justification, one can distinguish two main cases: the context of justification is either contrasted with the context of discovery, or it forms a unit there with. In the first case, the use of the context term becomes paradoxical, insofar as justification separated from scientific practice does not represent a field of reference which could be specifically contrasted with another field of reference (I b). In the second case, the unifying definitions contradict the contextual meaning of discovery and justification (1 c). In the last section, I point to a useful application of the concept of context which can be found in Reichenbach's argumentation and which refers to the practical conditions of justification(2).
|
Keywords | Hans Reichenbach Justification Rechtfertigung Discovery Entdeckung Context Kontext Genesis Genese Validity Gültigkeit Knowledge Wissen Concept of Context Kontextbegriff |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2003 |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
DOI | 10.1007/0-306-48214-2_20 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge.Hans Reichenbach - 1938 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology.Michael Williams - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
The Rise of Scientific Philosophy.Hans Reichenbach - 1951 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
View all 17 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Inductive Justification and Discovery. On Hans Reichenbach’s Foundation of the Autonomy of the Philosophy of Science.Gregor Schiemann - 2005 - In Schickore J. & Steinle F. (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 23-39.
Similar books and articles
Reichenbach on the Relative a Priori and the Context of Discovery/Justification Distinction.Samet Bagce - 2011 - Synthese 181 (1):79 - 93.
Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology.Harvey Siegel - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):297-321.
How Can We Use the Distinction Between Discovery and Justification? On the Weaknesses of the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Science.Thomas Sturm & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2006 - In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Springer. pp. 133--158.
Inductive Justification and Discovery. On Hans Reichenbach’s Foundation of the Autonomy of the Philosophy of Science.Gregor Schiemann - 2005 - In Schickore J. & Steinle F. (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 23-39.
Pragmatyczne i apragmatyczne aspekty odkrycia naukowego.Elżbieta Pietruska-Madej - 1995 - Filozofia Nauki 4.
Observation and Experiment in the Natural and Social Sciences.Maria Carla Galavotti (ed.) - 2003 - Springer Verlag.
Lost Wanderers in the Forest of Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Discovery-Justification Distinction.Don Howard - 2006 - In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Springer. pp. 3--22.
Science as Will and Representation: Carnap, Reichenbach, and the Sociology of Science.Alan W. Richardson - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):162.
Is It Justifiable to Abandon All Search for a Logic of Discovery?Mehul Shah - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):253 – 269.
Context of Discovery and Context of Justification.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (4):501-515.
The "Context of Discovery/Context of Verification" Distinction and Descriptive Human Science.Amedeo Giorgi - 1986 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 17 (2):151-166.
Context Dependence.Kent Bach - 2012 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Continuum International.
The Use of Situation Theory in Context Modeling.Varol Akman & Mehmet Surav - 1997 - Computational Intelligence 12 (4):1-13.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-09-12
Total views
1,001 ( #6,142 of 2,499,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
107 ( #6,540 of 2,499,746 )
2013-09-12
Total views
1,001 ( #6,142 of 2,499,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
107 ( #6,540 of 2,499,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads