In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 82-107 (2008)
Causation and the laws of nature are nothing over and above the pattern of events, just like a movie is nothing over and above the sequence of frames. Or so I will argue. The position I will argue for is broadly inspired by Hume and Lewis, and may be expressed in the slogan: what must be, must be grounded in what is.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Can Interventionists Be Neo-Russellians? Interventionism, the Open Systems Argument, and the Arrow of Entropy.Alexander Reutlinger - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):273-293.
On 'Stabilising' Medical Mechanisms, Truth-Makers and Epistemic Causality: A Critique to Williamson and Russo's Approach.Stefan Dragulinescu - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):785-800.
Humean Supervenience, Composition as Identity and Quantum Wholes.Claudio Calosi & Matteo Morganti - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (6):1173-1194.
Similar books and articles
Singular Causation and Law.Gurol Irzik - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:537 - 543.
Are the Laws of Nature Deductively Closed?Alan Baker - 1999 - In H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer Academic Press. pp. 91--109.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads487 ( #3,757 of 2,171,800 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,602 of 2,171,800 )
How can I increase my downloads?