Tad Schmaltz
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
There is considerable debate among scholars over whether Descartes allowed for genuine body–body interaction. I begin by considering Michael Della Rocca’s recent claim that Descartes accepted such interaction, and that his doctrine of the creation of the eternal truths indicates how this interaction could be acceptable to him. Though I agree that Descartes was inclined to accept real bodily causes of motion, I differ from Della Rocca in emphasizing that his ontology ultimately does not allow for them. This is not the end of the story, however, since two of Descartes’s successors offered incompatible ways of developing his conflicted account of motion. I contrast the occasionalist view of Nicolas Malebranche that changes in motion derive directly from divine volitions with the non-occasionalist claim of Pierre-Sylvain Regis that such changes derive from a nature distinct from God. In light of Della Rocca’s interpretation, it is noteworthy that the issue of eternal truths is relevant to both alternative accounts. Indeed, Regis took the doctrine that such truths are created to provide crucial support for his alternative to an occasionalist account of body–body interaction. What does not help Della Rocca, however, is that Regis’s view of motion requires a fundamental revision of Descartes’s ontology. Author Keywords: Descartes; Malebranche; Regis; Causation; Motion; Eternal Truths.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.09.004
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths.Harry Frankfurt - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (1):36-57.
Force (God) in Descartes' Physics.Gary C. Hatfield - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (2):113-140.
Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths.E. M. Curley - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (4):569-597.
Descartes's Theory of Modality.Jonathan Bennett - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (4):639-667.
The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures.Lawrence Nolan - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):169–194.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Occasionalism and Mechanism: Fontenelle's Objections to Malebranche.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):293 – 313.
Régis's Scholastic Mechanism.Walter Ott - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):2-14.
Nicolas Malebranche.Tad Schmaltz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descartes’ Eternal Truths, Created and Un Created.Predrag Milidrag - 2005 - Filozofija I Društvo 2005 (26):157-175.
The Eleatic Descartes.Thomas Lennon - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):29-45.
Descartes: Body and Soul.Peter Remnant - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):377 - 386.


Added to PP index

Total views
85 ( #117,525 of 2,411,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,463 of 2,411,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes