In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4. pp. 214 (2013)

Authors
Joshua Schechter
Brown University
Abstract
We are reliable about logic in the sense that we by-and-large believe logical truths and disbelieve logical falsehoods. Given that logic is an objective subject matter, it is difficult to provide a satisfying explanation of our reliability. This generates a significant epistemological challenge, analogous to the well-known Benacerraf-Field problem for mathematical Platonism. One initially plausible way to answer the challenge is to appeal to evolution by natural selection. The central idea is that being able to correctly deductively reason conferred a heritable survival advantage upon our ancestors. However, there are several arguments that purport to show that evolutionary accounts cannot even in principle explain how it is that we are reliable about logic. In this paper, I address these arguments. I show that there is no general reason to think that evolutionary accounts are incapable of explaining our reliability about logic
Keywords Benacerraf-Field problem, epistemology of logic, evolution, natural selection, reliability challenge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2013
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672707.003.0008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Reliability Challenge and the Epistemology of Logic.Joshua Schechter - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):437-464.
Where Philosophical Intuitions Come From.Helen De Cruz - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):233-249.
Is There a Reliability Challenge for Logic?Joshua Schechter - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):325-347.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Reliability Challenge and the Epistemology of Logic.Joshua Schechter - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):437-464.
On Explaining Knowledge of Necessity.Joel Pust - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (1):71–87.
Reliability as a Virtue.Robert Audi - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
Reliability in Mathematical Physics.Michael Liston - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (1):1-21.
Logic or Reason?Penelope Rush - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (2):127-163.
Cognitive Faculties and Evolutionary Naturalism.Bernardo Cantens - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:201-208.
The Reliability of an Instrument.Marcel Boumans - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):215 – 246.
Naturalizm i geneza logiki.Jan Woleński - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total views
739 ( #9,970 of 2,505,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #16,064 of 2,505,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes