Philosophies 5 (19):19-0 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
Contemporary Natural Philosophy is understood here as a project of the pursuit of the integrated description of reality distinguished by the precisely formulated criteria of objectivity, and by the assumption that the statements of this description can be assessed only as true or false according to clearly specified verification procedures established with the exclusive goal of the discrimination between these two logical values, but not with respect to any other norms or values established by the preferences of human collectives or by the individual choices. This distinction assumes only logical consistency, but not completeness. Completeness is desirable, but may be impossible. This paper is not intended as a comprehensive program for the development of the Contemporary Natural Philosophy but rather as a preparation for such program advocating some necessary revisions and extensions of the methodology currently considered as the scientific method. This is the actual focus of the paper and the reason for the reference to Baconian _idola mentis_. Francis Bacon wrote in _Novum Organum_ about the fallacies obstructing progress of science. The present paper is an attempt to remove obstacles for the Contemporary Natural Philosophy project to which we have assigned the names of the Idols of the Number, the Idols of the Common Sense, and the Idols of the Elephant.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3390/philosophies5030019
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.Eugene Wigner - 1960 - Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
Realism.Michael Dummett - 1982 - Synthese 52 (1):145--165.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Francis Bacon's Concept of Objectivity and the Idols of the Mind.Perez Zagorin - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Science 34 (4):379-393.
Rediscovering the logical analysis of language.Ekaterina Vostrikova & Petr Kusliy - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 50 (4):8-20.
Francis Bacon and the Classification of Natural History.Peter Anstey - 2012 - Early Science and Medicine 17 (1):11-31.
Francis Bacon's Doctrine of Idols: A Diagnosis of ‘Universal Madness’.S. V. Weeks - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Science 52 (1):1-39.
The Gay Science of Francis Bacon.Igor S. Dmitriev - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):181-201.
The Universal Significance of China Natural Aesthetic Tradition.Fu-Xing Xue - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:88-96.
Methodological Problems of Natural Science.B. M. Kedrov - 1964 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 3 (2):3-14.
The Methodology of Ramified Natural Theology.Hugh G. Gauch - 2013 - Philosophia Christi 15 (2):283-298.
Reality and Semantic Representation.William G. Lycan - 1976 - The Monist 59 (3):424-440.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-09-02

Total views
8 ( #974,232 of 2,444,856 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #311,140 of 2,444,856 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes